Key result
Integrating psychological evaluation and treatment into routine cardiology care addresses critical psycho-cardiology needs.
Why the study?
Psychological factors have long been proposed to influence somatic disease pathophysiology, but mechanistic validation has only recently emerged, particularly in psycho-cardiology.
Psychological-cardiovascular associations merit clinical awareness; leaves open causal validation in prospective trials.
Although it has been proposed in scholarly works for centuries that psychological factors play a role in the pathophysiology of somatic disease, this belief has not been validated mechanistically until relatively recently. This article discusses one specific instance of this general phenomenon: psycho-cardiology. Combining insights from epidemiological research, which has been prolific in showing associations between cardiovascular and psychological diseases, and the basic science research that has recently begun elucidating the biological mechanisms that may underlie those associations, the aim of this article is to provide a broad overview of the field of psycho-cardiology as it is presently understood. Beginning with a history of the development of psycho-cardiology, the article proceeds through separate sections that discuss contemporary research in the field under the following categories: epidemiology, clinical manifestations, structural and functional derangements, induction mechanisms, the impact of technological and diagnostic changes, and the practical implications for treatment. Taken together, the body of work that this article surveys points clearly to the need to integrate the evaluation for and treatment of psychological disease into the scope of clinical cardiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meiyan Liu (2017) conducted a review in Cardiovascular and psychological diseases. A broad overview of psycho-cardiology highlights the need to integrate the evaluation for and treatment of psychological disease into the scope of clinical cardiology.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: