Key result
Childhood psychological well-being is linked to lower midlife cardiometabolic risk.
Why the study?
Childhood adversity is linked to poor cardiometabolic outcomes, but less is known about the impact of positive childhood psychological well-being on adult cardiometabolic risk.
Cohort (n=4,007)
Effect estimate: b = -0.14 (95% CI -0.28, -0.006)
Should not change prevention strategies; hypothesis-generating for childhood well-being in adult cardiometabolic risk.
Childhood adversity is linked to poor cardiometabolic outcomes, but less is known about positive childhood factors. Using data from 4,007 members of the 1958 British Birth Cohort, we investigated whether children with greater psychological well-being had lower adulthood cardiometabolic risk. At age 11, participants wrote essays about their future. Two judges rated each essay for nine psychological well-being items (Finn’s r = .82–.91), which were combined into a standardized overall score (Cronbach’s α = .91). When participants reached age 45, nurses assessed their blood pressure, heart rate, lipids, glycosylated hemoglobin, fibrinogen, and C-reactive protein, which were standardized and summed for total cardiometabolic risk. Regressions indicated that children with greater psychological well-being had lower cardiometabolic risk ( b = −0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [−0.28, −0.006]): specifically, healthier total cholesterol ( b = −0.04, 95% CI = [−0.07, −0.003]) and triglycerides ( b = −0.06, 95% CI = [−0.09, −0.02]). Childhood psychological well-being may promote adulthood cardiometabolic health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boehm et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Cardiometabolic risk (n=4,007). Psychological well-being in childhood vs. Lower psychological well-being was evaluated on Total cardiometabolic risk at age 45 (b = -0.14, 95% CI -0.28, -0.006). Greater psychological well-being at age 11 was associated with lower total cardiometabolic risk at age 45 (b = -0.14; 95% CI -0.28 to -0.006).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: