BACKGROUND: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression has been studied extensively in clinical trials of metastatic urothelial carcinoma. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to provide information on the prevalence of tumor PD-L1 expression and treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma in a real-world setting. METHODS: PREVAIL (NCT03788746) enrolled patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma undergoing systemic first-line treatment at US community oncology practices. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of pretreatment tumor PD-L1-high expression using an immunohistochemistry antibody for PD-L1 (SP263) [Roche Diagnostics]. Secondary endpoints included treatment patterns and association between PD-L1 expression and objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among 139 patients, the pretreatment prevalence of PD-L1-high expression was 53.2% (95% confidence interval 44.6-61.7). Forty-seven patients (33.8%) received anti-PD-L1/anti-programmed death 1 agents alone as first-line therapy. In all evaluable patients, ORR was 50.9%, median PFS was 15.1 months, and median OS was 25.4 months from the first dose of first-line therapy. There was no significant difference in PFS (hazard ratio 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.34-1.52; p = 0.385) or OS (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% confidence interval 0.44-1.15; p = 0.164) in patients with pretreatment PD-L1-high versus PD-L1-low expression. Objective response rate was similar between patients with PD-L1-high (17/33; 51.5%) and PD-L1-low (12/24; 50.0%) expression. CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study, more than half of patients had high pretreatment tumor PD-L1 expression. There was no significant association between PD-L1 status and ORR, PFS, or OS with any first-line therapy, although definitive conclusions cannot be made because of the limited sample size.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grivas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: