An aspect of bid vector design in choice experiments that has received limited attention is the effect of using non-rounded (or precise) rather than rounded bids. Insights from the marketing and psychology literatures suggests that there are many factors potentially influencing the effects of using non-rounded bids, including image and level effects, accuracy cues, processing fluency, and stimulating more cognitively-based System 2 thinking. Using a split-sample experimental approach in a choice experiment, we find evidence that non-rounded bids may trigger use of System 2 cognitive processes, thereby increasing the number of significant attribute coefficients as well as reducing model variance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morrison et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: