While the importance of high-quality recycling is emphasized in European acquis, assessing the quality of recycling remains a challenge. Advancing recent work on the subject, a new multidimensional indicator is presented and applied to the case of two waste materials of the Construction and Demolition Sector: glass and brick. The indicator assesses the quality of recycling considering three dimensions (Technical, Temporal, and Environmental) providing a qualitative outcome. A 3D diagram is developed where each axis represents one of the three dimensions such that the space under study is totally included in a cube. Each of the three axes of the cube is divided into two sections via a threshold value, resulting in eight sub-cubes corresponding to eight qualitative levels of quality. The results for the two case studies show the potential of the indicator. Concerning glass, two pathways were evaluated: a closed-loop process (flat glass-to-flat glass) and an open-loop process (flat glass-to-recycled aggregates). When the indicator is applied, the former option resulted in a High-Quality level, whereas the latter in a Low-Quality one. For the bricks, three different open-loop recycling pathways were assessed: replacement of cement, recycled aggregates, and alkaline activation. The recycled aggregates pathway resulted in a Medium-High-Quality 3 level, whereas the other pathways in a High-Quality one. Since it can be applied to any combination of recycling pathways and waste material fractions, the indicator shows potential to function as a decision-support tool for industry and policymakers, building on and advancing previous attempts by streamlining calculation and communication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Renzetti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: