Microbial consortia in microbial electrosynthesis (MES) can couple cathodic electron utilization with CO2 fixation through interspecies electron transfer and metabolite cross-feeding. However, how defined functional members coordinate interfacial electron input with downstream acetogenic metabolism remains insufficiently understood. Here, we constructed a defined three-member consortium comprising the Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 and the acetogens Clostridium aceticum and Acetobacterium woodii to investigate how functional complementarity supports acetate electrosynthesis. The three-member consortium reached a maximum acetate concentration of 2.33 ± 0.17 g L–1, 2.62-fold that of the A. woodii and C. aceticum binary consortium, accompanied by a higher current density, stronger redox activity, and more pronounced riboflavin-related signals. Phase-resolved fhs abundances, metabolomic profiles, and flavin perturbation experiments further supported spatially differentiated roles within the consortium: S. oneidensis enhanced cathode-associated electron input, while phase-resolved fhs abundances and H2/formate dynamics indicated that acetogenic functions were maintained across both biofilm and planktonic phases and coupled to soluble-intermediate turnover. Despite varying initial inoculation ratios, the consortium consistently converged on similar acetate production and community functions, indicating that steady-state performance of the consortium was not strongly dependent on the precise initial community composition. These results suggest that the enhanced performance of the three-member consortium was associated with coordinated electron transfer and metabolic handoff among functionally complementary members. This study demonstrates that enhanced CO2 electrosynthesis arises from the reorganization of electron-metabolic interactions rather than the simple addition of functional members, providing a mechanistic basis for the rational design of electrically driven synthetic microbial communities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: