Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) is a non-traditional machining process used for producing complex geometries in conductive and difficult-to-machine materials. Its process responses depend on interacting electrical and thermal parameters, making prediction and parameter selection suitable for data-driven modelling. This study presents a computational machine-learning workflow for predicting material removal rate (MRR), surface roughness (Ra), and tool wear rate (TWR) from pulse-on time, pulse-off time, and peak current. A reproducible synthetic dataset containing 135 operating conditions was generated within the ranges Ton = 3–7 µs, Toff = 2–6 µs, and peak current = 10–30 A. A linear regression baseline, random forest regressor, and multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (ANN) were trained using a fixed 75:25 train-test split and evaluated using R2, mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean squared error (RMSE). Across the three responses, the ANN achieved a mean test-set R2 of 0.7743, compared with 0.6210 for random forest and 0.4840 for the linear baseline. The ANN was subsequently used as a surrogate model for a weighted multi-response optimization that favoured high MRR and low Ra and TWR. The resulting model-derived operating point was Ton = 7 µs, Toff = 2 µs, and peak current = 10 A, with predicted MRR = 1.0314 mm3/min, Ra = 3.7049 µm, and TWR = 0.1001 mm3/min. Because all observations are synthetic, these values are computational proof-of-concept results and must not be interpreted as experimental measurements. The workflow is intended as a reproducible template that can be retrained and experimentally validated using laboratory EDM data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gowda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: