Handwriting recognition for mathematical expressions remains challenging in educational settings, especially when solutions combine Korean text and symbolic notation. This study reports the design and classroom implementation of an AI-based handwriting annotation tool that uses the Mathpix OCR API to convert handwritten solutions into LaTeX and allows students to correct errors. An eight-session program integrated mathematics for AI (functions, loss functions, gradients, and neural networks) with data annotation and human-in-the-loop debugging. Eighty-three 12th-grade students at a high school in Incheon, Korea, completed pre- and post-tests of mathematics attitude and computational thinking. Paired-samples analyses showed small-to-medium gains in mathematics confidence and interest and significant improvements in algorithmic thinking, creativity, cooperativity, and critical thinking; lower raw problem-solving difficulty scores indicated fewer self-reported difficulties. Open-ended responses suggested that students viewed AI as mathematically grounded, recognized stronger links between school mathematics and real-world technologies, and gained confidence despite challenges with OCR errors and LaTeX editing. Although the single-group, short-term design in one school limits causal inference and generalizability, the findings suggest that human-in-the-loop handwriting tools can support mathematics engagement and computational thinking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sejun Oh (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: