This working paper reconstructs Sweden's intergenerational carrying system as a changing architecture of persons, households, dyads, kin, markets, services, and public institutions. It separates execution, financing, responsibility, coordination, buffering, repair, and residual consequence; reconstructs a five-stage historical sequence; and uses Swedish couple-level evidence to identify the adult dyad as a distinct regulatory carrier in parental-care allocation. The paper finds functional heterogeneity rather than a one-dimensional family-to-state or state-to-family transition. It introduces configuration reserve and reserve-failure routing, while leaving the historical derivative of total dyadic integration demand and reserve depth open. No fertility effect is inferred.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. E. Fröderberg (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: