Key result
Chronic pericardial effusion is associated with significantly elevated antimyolemmal and antifibrillary antibodies vs. controls.
Why the study?
Specific laboratory parameters predicting the frequency and severity of recurrences after initial drainage of chronic pericardial effusion are lacking.
Case-Control (n=56)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Serum antimyolemmal antibodies were associated with early recurrence after drainage; leaves open whether they identify candidates for targeted immunomodulation.
OBJECTIVES: Chronic pericardial effusion may be challenging in terms of diagnosis and treatment. Specific laboratory parameters predicting the frequency and severity of recurrences after initial drainage of pericardial effusion are lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pericardial fluid (PF) and serum (SE) samples from 30 patients with chronic pericardial effusion (PE) who underwent pericardiocentesis and pericardioscopically guided pericardial biopsy were compared with SE and PF samples from 26 control patients. The levels of antimyolemmal (AMLA) and antifibrillary antibodies (AFA) in PE and SE from patients with pericardial effusion as well as PF and SE from controls were determined and compared. RESULTS: AMLAs and AFAs in PF and SE were significantly higher in patients with chronic pericardial effusion than in the control group (AMLAs: p = 0,01 for PF and p = 0,004 for serum; AFAs: p < 0,001 for PF and p = 0,003 for serum). Patients with recurrence of PE within 3 months after pericardiocentesis had significantly higher levels of AMLAs in SE (p = 0,029) than patients without recurrence of PE. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of elevated anticardiac antibodies in PE and SE indicates increased immunological reactivity in chronic pericardial effusion. High titer serum levels of AMLAs also correlate with recurrence of pericardial effusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karatolios et al. (2016) conducted a case-control in Chronic pericardial effusion (n=56). Chronic pericardial effusion vs. Control patients was evaluated on Levels of antimyolemmal (AMLA) and antifibrillary antibodies (AFA) in pericardial fluid and serum (p=0.01 for PF and 0.004 for serum (AMLAs); <0.001 for PF and 0.003 for serum (AFAs)). Chronic pericardial effusion was associated with significantly higher levels of antimyolemmal (p=0.01 for PF) and antifibrillary antibodies (p<0.001 for PF) compared to controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: