Key result
Anti-inflammatory therapy in coronary artery disease was reviewed, proposing a 4R framework—right target, patient, timing, and benefit-risk balance—to guide future clinical translation.
Why the study?
Chronic inflammation is central to atherosclerosis in CAD, but anti-inflammatory therapies with demonstrated clinical benefit remain limited.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A proposed 4R framework aims to optimize future trials of anti-inflammatory therapies in coronary artery disease through refined inflammatory phenotyping and stage-dependent efficacy evaluation.
Inflammation is an essential physiological process that preserves host homeostasis, yet chronic inflammation is now recognized as a common pathological basis of many chronic diseases. In coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic inflammation is central to the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis. Accordingly, anti-inflammatory therapy has emerged as a major focus of investigation in this field. Although multiple inflammatory pathways have been evaluated as therapeutic targets in clinical trials, strategies with demonstrated clinical benefit remain limited. In this review, we examine the sources of inflammation in CAD, approaches to inflammatory risk stratification, and advances in anti-inflammatory therapy. To explain divergent trial outcomes and guide future clinical translation, we propose a 4R framework: the right target, the right patient, the right timing, and the right benefit–risk balance. Anti-inflammatory treatment remains promising. Within this framework, refined inflammatory phenotyping and evaluation of stage-dependent efficacy represent immediate priorities for future trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease. Anti-inflammatory therapy was evaluated. Anti-inflammatory therapy in coronary artery disease was reviewed, proposing a 4R framework—right target, patient, timing, and benefit-risk balance—to guide future clinical translation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: