Objective: To compare gait, balance, and subjective measures of dizziness outcomes in patients with vestibular hypofunction completing either a novel, incremental vestibular ocular reflex (VOR) adaptation program or traditional vestibular rehabilitation. Design: Randomized, double-blinded, crossover-controlled trial including a 6-month follow-up. Setting: Tertiary care, outpatient physical therapy. Participants: N=24 individuals with chronic peripheral vestibular hypofunction. Interventions: Group A first completed incremental VOR adaptation training using the novel, head-mounted StableEyes device, while group B completed traditional gaze stability exercises considered standard of care in vestibular rehabilitation. After 3 weeks, participants entered a 3-week washout period before crossing over to the opposing gaze stability training intervention and starting balance and gait training. Main Outcome Measures: tests, following the intent-to-treat principle. However, we found no difference between the groups in the change of any clinical outcome (gait, balance, or subjective symptoms) after completion of either/both types of gaze stability training. Regardless of cohort placement, individuals improved their gait, balance confidence, and global impression of change, yet these improvements were not retained at 6 months. Conclusions: The novel incremental VOR adaptation method for gaze stability training offers advantages similar to those of traditional vestibular rehabilitation in improving gait, balance, and subjective symptoms, though these improvements are lost at 6 months.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Millar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: