Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present comparative x-ray spectroscopic measurements using an x-ray film, a charged-coupled device (CCD), and imaging plates as the detectors. An aluminum K-shell x-ray emission in the energy range of 1.8–2.15 keV is produced from a laser-produced plasma, and dispersed using a flat crystal spectrometer. Our interest is in the response of these detectors to weak x-ray emission, their suitability for quantitative and absolute measurements, as well of ease of use. We find that scientific-grade CCD detectors offer superior signal-to-noise performance, while imaging plates are a viable alternative particularly if large detection areas or curved surfaces are required. Despite the excellent spatial resolution of an x-ray film, imaging plates are preferred to film for quantitative measurement as signal to noise ratio is greater by an order of magnitude.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Howe et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: