Growth rates determined from recapture of free-ranging nurse sharks (Ginglymostoma cirratum) averaged 13.1 ? 9.5 cm/yr and 2.3 ? 1.3 kg/yr based upon recapture of 44 tagged animals (28.9% recovery) with an average at-large interval of 247 d (range: 5-876 d), and an average size at tagging of 126.6 cm TL and 9.8 kg body mass. Growth measurements on three captively maintained nurse sharks averaged over a 3 yr period, resulted in growth rates that were slightly faster (19.1 ? 4.9 cm/yr and 4.0 ? 1.7 kg/yr), but not significantly different. The captive study, however, revealed that growth rates decreased as the age of the animals increased (from approx. 3-6 yr of age). Estimation of growth in the captive population, at times when animals were of similar size as those tagged in the wild, resulted in growth rates that were considerably closer (13.8 ? 2.3 cm/yr and 3.7 ? 2.2 kg/yr). Percent changes in total length for free-ranging nurse sharks and captive nurse sharks of similar size were 11.4%/yr and 11.3%/yr, respectively, while percent changes in body mass averaged 32.7%/yr for recaptured animals compared with 31.6%/yr for comparable sized nurse sharks in captivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carrier et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: