Key result
Certoparin matches unfractionated heparin for preventing VTE events in acute ischemic stroke.
Why the study?
Patients with acute ischemic stroke are at substantial risk of thromboembolic complications and require effective antithrombotic prophylaxis, but the noninferiority of certoparin compared to unfractionated heparin was not established.
RCT (n=545)
Double-blind
randomized
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Certoparin is noninferior to UFH for VTE prophylaxis in acute ischemic stroke; confirms once-daily LMWH as a practical alternative in this population.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with stroke are at substantial risk of thromboembolic complications and therefore require antithrombotic prophylaxis. To show the noninferiority of the low-molecular-weight heparin certoparin to unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the prevention of thromboembolic complications, we performed a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled multicenter trial in patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: Overall, 545 patients were randomized within 24 hours of stroke onset to treatment with certoparin (3000 U anti-Xa OD; n=272) or UFH (5000 U TID; n=273) for 12 to 16 days. Patients with paresis of a leg and an National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 4 to 30 points were included. The primary end point was a composite outcome of proximal deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or death related to venous thromboembolism during treatment. Computed tomography was performed at trial entry, after 7 days, and when clinical deterioration occurred. RESULTS: The per-protocol analysis revealed 17 (7.0%) primary events in the certoparin group compared with 24 (9.7%) in the UFH group, thereby demonstrating noninferiority (P=0.0011), confirmed by intention-to-treat analysis (6.6% versus 8.8%; P=0.008). Major bleeding occurred during treatment in 3 patients allocated to certoparin (1.1%) and 5 patients allocated to UFH (1.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Certoparin (3000 U anti-Xa OD) is at least as effective and safe as UFH (TID) for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diener et al. (2005) conducted an RCT in acute ischemic stroke (n=545). Certoparin vs. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) 5000 U TID was evaluated on composite outcome of proximal deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or death related to venous thromboembolism during treatment (p=0.0011 for noninferiority). Certoparin was noninferior to unfractionated heparin for preventing proximal DVT, pulmonary embolism, or VTE-related death in acute ischemic stroke (7.0% vs 9.7%; P=0.0011 for noninferiority).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: