Key result
Right cervical vagal nerve stimulation reduces defibrillation threshold by ~32% vs. control.
Why the study?
The efficacy of electrical defibrillation is related to autonomic status, and the potential of cervical vagal nerve stimulation to enhance defibrillation efficacy was investigated.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The efficacy of electrical defibrillation is considered to be related to the autonomic status. In search of a possible adjunct to enhance the therapeutic performance of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. we investigated whether parasympathetic manipulation by cervical vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) increases defibrillation efficacy. The effects of VNS on transcardiac defibrillation threshold (DFT) were assessed in 55 anesthetized dogs. In neurally intact dogs, right and left unilateral VNS at 10 mA for 7 seconds significantly decreased the DFT after 10 seconds of ventricular fibrillation (control: 3.1 +/- 0.9 J, right: 2.1 +/- 0.9 J [delta-35 +/- 12%, P < 0.0001], left: 2.2 +/- 0.8 J [delta-31 +/- 11%, P < 0.0005]), while bilateral VNS did not (2.8 +/- 1.0 J). In dogs with decentralized vagus nerves, both unilateral and bilateral VNS decreased the DFT. The extent of the VNS-induced decrease in DFT was dependent on the current and the duration of stimulation. We conclude that unilateral VNS decreases the DFT, while bilateral VNS paradoxically has no effect on the DFT unless the vagi are decentralized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murakawa et al. (2003) studied Ventricular fibrillation (n=55). Unilateral cervical vagal nerve stimulation vs. No stimulation (control) was evaluated on Transcardiac defibrillation threshold (DFT) after 10 seconds of ventricular fibrillation (MD -1.0 J, p=<0.0001). In neurally intact dogs, unilateral right cervical vagal nerve stimulation significantly decreased the defibrillation threshold by 35% compared to control.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: