Key result
Artificial neural network detects abnormal ECG signals and arrhythmias with ~86% accuracy.
Why the study?
ECG signals are noisy and complex, requiring effective feature extraction and neural network techniques to accurately identify types of cardiovascular diseases.
Suggests neural network ECG classification feasibility; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Electrocardiogram (ECG) signals are used to identify cardiovascular disease. The availability of signal processing and neural networks techniques for processing ECG signals has inspired us to do research that consists of extracting features of an ECG signals to identify types of cardiovascular diseases. We distinguish between normal and abnormal ECG data using signal processing and neural networks toolboxes in Matlab. Data, which are downloaded from an ECG database, Physiobank, are used for training and testing the neural network. To distinguish normal and abnormal ECG with the significant accuracy, pattern recognition tools with NN is used. Feature Extraction method is also used to identify specific heart diseases. The diseases that were identified include Tachycardia, Bradycardia, first-degree Atrioventricular (AV), and second-degree Atrioventricular. Since ECG signals are very noisy, signal processing techniques are applied to remove the noise contamination. The heart rate of each signal is calculated by finding the distance between R-R intervals of the signal. The QRS complex is also used to detect Atrioventricular blocks. The algorithm successfully distinguished between normal and abnormal data as well as identifying the type of disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Savalia et al. (2017) studied Cardiovascular Disease (Arrhythmia) (n=66). Feature extraction and Artificial Neural Network algorithm vs. Ground truth annotations was evaluated on Classification accuracy of normal vs abnormal ECG signals. An artificial neural network using feature extraction successfully distinguished between normal and abnormal ECG signals with 86% accuracy and identified specific arrhythmias.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: