Cardiac rhythm management: the shape of things to come

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this article is to forecast a major imminent change in the clinical practice of cardiac rhythm management, which is argued to be remote patient monitoring, its potential benefits to clinical practitioners and its barriers to widespread diffusion. RECENT FINDINGS: All four major manufacturers of cardiac rhythm management devices have recently introduced varying types of systems that allow remote patient monitoring. These remote patient monitoring systems promise more efficient patient management in today's clinical setting of rapidly growing numbers of patients with increasingly heterogeneous etiology, varying indications and comorbidities. The major differences between current systems are related to the degree of patient involvement in remote patient monitoring and limits on patient mobility. Other important factors that influence the value of remote patient monitoring are the degree to which remote follow-up would completely fulfill the requirements of an in-office follow-up and the inclusion of sensors that enable the prediction of major clinical events such as heart failure decompensation with a high degree of accuracy. SUMMARY: Even if the different remote patient monitoring systems currently available offer several clinical benefits such as early detection of cardiac events and complications, reduced follow-up costs and increased safety, the full potential of such systems requires the possibility to easily transfer relevant patient data to common patient databases that are linked to hospital information systems or electronic patient records. Only then will it be possible to gain a complete picture of patient conditions. This will require the development of common protocols for data communication and may involve issues of patient data ownership and integrity.