Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of three different dose levels of pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Ro 25-8315) on progenitor cell mobilization and hematologic recovery in cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Breast cancer patients (n = 36) were randomly assigned to receive before (part I) and after (part II) chemotherapy either a single-dose injection of Ro 25-8315 (20 μg/kg, n = 9; 60 μg/kg, n = 9; 100 μg/kg, n = 10) or a standard daily dose of filgrastim (part I, 10 μg/kg/d; part II, 5 μg/kg/d) (control group, n = 8). RESULTS: Overall, Ro 25-8315 was well tolerated. In part I, more progenitor cell mobilization was observed with Ro 25-8315 100 μg/kg. The peak of circulating CD34 + cells was obtained at day +5 in the four groups, and the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) returned to less than 20 × 10 9 /L by day +15. In part II, high levels of circulating CD34 + cells (> 20 cells/μL) were obtained in all four groups. The chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (< 1 × 10 9 /L) was similar in the four groups. Ro 25-8315 100 μg/kg was more effective than filgrastim in reducing the number of patients with an ANC less than 0.5 × 10 9 /L on day +12 after chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: A single injection of Ro 25-8315 100 μg/kg might be the optimal dose for steady-state peripheral-blood progenitor cell mobilization. A single injection of 20, 60, or 100 μg/kg could be as efficient as daily administration of filgrastim to correct chemotherapy-induced cytopenia. The optimal dose of Ro 25-8315 should be determined according to the planned chemotherapy regimen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Viens et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: