Key result
RSPV-first PFA linked to ~83% fewer vagal responses vs an LSPV-first approach.
Why the study?
Pulsed field ablation of pulmonary veins can induce vagal responses and transient ganglionated plexi effects, but the impact of targeting the right superior pulmonary vein first on preventing these responses was unclear.
Does a right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV)-first approach reduce intraprocedural vagal responses in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing PVI with PFA?
Cohort (n=80)
Does a right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV)-first approach reduce intraprocedural vagal responses in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing PVI with PFA?
Absolute Event Rate: 13% vs 78%
p-value: p=<.001
Initiating pulsed field ablation at the right superior pulmonary vein significantly reduces intraprocedural vagal responses and the need for temporary pacing compared to a left superior pulmonary vein-first approach.
RSPV-first PFA sequencing was associated with fewer vagal responses; leaves open whether order should change standard PVI workflows.
BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is selective for the myocardium. However, vagal responses and reversible effects on ganglionated plexi (GP) are observed during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Anterior-right GP ablation has been proven to effectively prevent vagal responses during radiofrequency-based PVI. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that PFA-induced transient anterior-right GP modulation when targeting the right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV) before any other pulmonary veins (PVs) may effectively prevent intraprocedural vagal responses. METHODS: Eighty consecutive paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients undergoing PVI with PFA were prospectively included. In the first 40 patients, PVI was performed first targeting the left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV-first group). In the last 40 patients, RSPV was targeted first, followed by left PVs and right inferior PV (RSPV-first group). Heart rate (HR) and extracardiac vagal stimulation (ECVS) were evaluated at baseline, during PVI, and postablation to assess GP modulation. RESULTS: Vagal responses occurred in 31 patients (78%) in the LSPV-first group and 5 (13%) in the RSPV-first group (P <.001). Temporary pacing was needed in 14 patients (35%) in the LSPV-first group and 3 (8%) in the RSPV-first group (P = .003). RSPV isolation was associated with similar acute HR increase in the 2 groups (13 ± 11 bpm vs 15 ± 12 bpm; P = .3). No significant residual changes in HR or ECVS response were documented in both groups at the end of the procedure compared to baseline (all P >.05). CONCLUSION: PVI with PFA frequently induced vagal responses when initiated from the LSPV. Nevertheless, an RSPV-first approach promoted transient HR increase and reduced vagal response occurrence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monte et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=80). Right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV)-first approach vs. Left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV)-first approach was evaluated on Intraprocedural vagal responses (p=<.001). An RSPV-first approach during pulsed field ablation significantly reduced intraprocedural vagal responses compared to an LSPV-first approach (13% vs 78%; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: