Key result
Beraprost sodium fails to show benefit in PAH trials due to dose-limiting adverse effects.
Why the study?
Parenteral prostacyclins are the gold standard for severe PAH but have technical and clinical burdens, prompting development of long-acting oral analogs like beraprost sodium.
Side effects limit beraprost dosing in PAH despite efficacy; leaves open whether better-tolerated analogs merit randomized testing.
Introduction: Parenteral prostacyclins are considered the gold standard treatment of severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, the technical and clinical burden of their continuous parenteral administration has led to the development of long-acting oral analogs.Areas covered: Following suggestive uncontrolled studies, an initial 3-month randomized placebo-controlled trial of the oral prostacyclin analog beraprost sodium (BPS) was completed, demonstrating significant improvement in the primary endpoint, which was the six-minute walk test. However, a subgroup analysis revealed that only idiopathic PAH patients benefited from the drug, secondary end points were negative and dosing was limited by side effects. A second 1-year randomized trial with a primary end point combining clinical stability and exercise capacity was negative. A secondary analysis revealed significant improvement after BPS intake at 6 months. Recent open-label studies with a modified release BPS formulation (BPS-MR) suggested long-term improvement in exercise capacity and clinical state in PAH patients. Randomized controlled trials with BPS-MR are underway but have been slowed by regulatory requirements of single optical isomer reformulation of BPS-MR (BPS-414d-MR).Expert opinion: BPS is efficacious in PAH but has failed until now in randomized controlled trials mainly because of side effects limiting dosing. Successive reformulations will hopefully produce better tolerated, purer and longer-acting preparations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dewachter et al. (2014) conducted a review in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Beraprost sodium (BPS) / Beraprost sodium MR (BPS-MR) vs. placebo was evaluated. Beraprost sodium is efficacious in pulmonary arterial hypertension but has failed in randomized controlled trials mainly because of side effects limiting dosing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: