Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The graphicality problem—whether or not a sequence of integers can be used to create a simple graph—is a key question in network theory and combinatorics, with many important practical applications. In this work, we study the graphicality of degree sequences distributed as a power law with a size-dependent cutoff and as a double power law with a size-dependent crossover. We combine the application of exact sufficient conditions for graphicality with heuristic conditions for nongraphicality which allow us to elucidate the physical reasons why some sequences are not graphical. For single power laws we recover the known phase diagram, we highlight the subtle interplay of distinct mechanisms violating graphicality and we explain why the infinite-size limit behavior is in some cases very far from being observed for finite sequences. For double power laws we derive the graphicality of infinite sequences for all possible values of the degree exponents γ 1 and γ 2 , uncovering a rich phase diagram and pointing out the existence of six qualitatively distinct ways graphicality can be violated. The validity of theoretical arguments is supported by extensive numerical analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anonymous et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: