Key result
Least disadvantaged neighborhood status linked to ~67% higher 30-day survival after OHCA.
Why the study?
Socioeconomic differences in the incidence and survival odds of adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Western Australia were not well characterized.
Does socioeconomic disadvantage increase the incidence and reduce survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in adults?
Cohort (n=23,975)
Does socioeconomic disadvantage increase the incidence and reduce survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in adults?
Odds Ratio: 1.67 (95% CI 1.28–2.18)
Absolute Event Rate: 14.72% vs 8.05%
p-value: p=<0.001
Greater socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with a significantly higher incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and poorer 30-day survival outcomes.
Socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with lower OHCA survival; extends incidence data but leaves open whether interventions narrow gaps.
Aims Investigate socioeconomic differences in the incidence and odds of survival of adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrests [OHCA] in Western Australia. Methods OHCA data for patients aged 15 years and older were sourced for the period 2015-2024 for WA. Socioeconomic status was classified using the Australian Bureau of Statistics Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage. Socioeconomic status was attributed based on each patient’s residential address and classified in quintiles. Crude and age-standardised incidence rates per 100,000 adult population was calculated for all OHCA. Survival (return of spontaneous circulation at hospital arrival and survival to 30-days) was assessed for resuscitation-attempted OHCA with medical aetiology. Incidence by socioeconomic quintile was modelled using negative binomial linear regression, and odds of survival by socioeconomic quintile using logistic regression. Results A total of 23,975 OHCAs were attended by emergency medical services in Western Australia, with a crude incidence of 117.34 per 100,000 population per year. Outcomes varied across the socioeconomic gradient, with higher incidence and poorer survival in more disadvantaged populations. Incidence decreased from 193.81/100,000 in the most disadvantaged quintile to 73.18/100,000 in the least disadvantaged quintile ( p <0.001). Among resuscitation-attempted medical OHCA, patients in the least disadvantage areas had 67% greater odds of 30-day survival than those in the most disadvantaged areas (OR: 1.67; 95%CI: 1.28-2.18). Conclusion Greater socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with a greater incidence of OHCA and poorer survival outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harris et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) (n=23,975). Least socioeconomic disadvantage (Quintile 5) vs. Most socioeconomic disadvantage (Quintile 1) was evaluated on 30-day survival among resuscitation-attempted medical OHCA (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.28-2.18, p=<0.001). Patients in the least disadvantaged socioeconomic areas had 67% greater odds of 30-day survival following medical out-of-hospital cardiac arrest compared to those in the most disadvantaged areas.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: