Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates that serum cystatin C outperforms creatinine for detecting reduced glomerular filtration rate in cardiac bypass patients, indicating improved diagnosis of postoperative renal impairment.
BACKGROUND: Assessment of renal function in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is important. Cystatin C has been proposed as an improved indicator of renal function. The aim of this study was to assess cystatin C as an early marker of changes in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) after CABG. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 61 CABG patients at different time points. Using (51)Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid ((51)Cr-EDTA) clearance as a 'gold standard', we compared the correlations and non-parametric receiver operator characteristic curves of serum cystatin C, serum creatinine and 24 h creatinine clearance (Ccr). RESULTS: The inverse of cystatin C correlated better with (51)Cr-EDTA than those of serum creatinine and Ccr (r = 0.8578, 0.6771 and 0.6929, respectively). Cystatin C exhibited significantly superior diagnostic accuracy for detecting GFR <80 mL/min/1.73 m(2) compared with serum creatinine (P = 0.013) and Ccr (P = 0.025); for detecting GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), cystatin C had similar diagnostic accuracy to Ccr (P = 0.812) but was superior to creatinine (P = 0.033). At the best cut-off value, cystatin C had sensitivity 89% and specificity 93% for detecting GFR <80 mL/min/1.73 m(2), sensitivity 86% and specificity 96% for detecting GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). CONCLUSIONS: Cystatin C is a better marker for detecting small temporary changes of GFR in CABG patients. This may allow better identification of patients with renal impairment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gu et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: