Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fructobacillus tropaeoli H-Sp-0-4, F. pseudoficulneus H-Sp-0-1, and F. pseudoficulneus H-Pj-0-2, previously isolated from stingless bee honey ( Scaptotrigona pectoralis and Plebeia jatiformis ) and identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and phylogeny, were evaluated for their resistance to technological processing stresses relevant to food applications. Ionic osmotic (NaCl), non-ionic osmotic (glucose: fructose 1:1), ethanol, and acid stresses were assessed using Hill's logistic equation to determine the inhibitory concentration for 50 % of the population ( IC 50 ). Then, sublethal stress conditions (8 % NaCl, 30 % sugars, 8 % ethanol, pH 4) were selected for kinetic modelling using the modified Gompertz and Baranyi models, which yielded growth parameters including maximum specific growth rate ( μ ), adaptation time ( λ ), and maximum growth ( A ). Ionicionally, cell surface properties (autoaggregation, coaggregation with different pathogenic strains, and hydrophobicity) were evaluated under ionic osmotic stress (6 % NaCl). All three strains tolerated the tested stress conditions, with processing stress generally reducing μ and A while increasing λ . F. pseudoficulneus strains, particularly H-Sp-0-1, exhibited greater versatility in growth, adaptation, and coaggregation with Staphylococcus aureus . Under saline stress, all strains reduced autoaggregation and coaggregation but increased hydrophobicity, indicating changes in their cell surface. These results provide quantitative, population-level descriptors of stress tolerance that identify these Fructobacillus strains, particularly F. pseudoficulneus , as candidates for further evaluation as starter cultures, pending validation in real food matrices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrade‐Velásquez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: