Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Studies of the value of abdominal ultrasound for diagnosing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated tuberculosis have major limitations. METHODS: culture from any site. Participants had at least 2 sputa and 1 blood specimen sent for mycobacterial cultures. Standardized data capture sheets were used for ultrasound reports. A blinded radiologist interpreted chest radiographs, categorized as "likely", "possible", and "unlikely" for HIV-associated tuberculosis. RESULTS: We enrolled 377 participants: 249 women, median age 35 years, 201 with tuberculosis, and median CD4 count 75 cells/µL. The following abdominal ultrasound findings independently predicted tuberculosis: lymph node long-axis ≥10 mm (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.41-9.38), splenic hypoechoic lesions (aOR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.91-6.24), and abdominal/pleural/pericardial effusions (aOR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.16-3.29). Presence of ≥1 of these 3 features had a sensitivity of 76.4% (95% CI, 69.8-82.3), a specificity of 68.6% (95% CI, 61.1-75.4), and a c-statistic of 0.784 (95% CI, 0.739-0.830). The sensitivity and specificity of chest radiograph assessed as likely tuberculosis was 55.2% (95% CI, 47.2-62.9) and 83.9% (95% CI, 77.0-89.4), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Three features of tuberculosis on abdominal ultrasound independently predicted tuberculosis with moderate diagnostic performance in seriously ill HIV-positive inpatients. Abdominal ultrasound was more sensitive but less specific than chest radiograph for diagnosing tuberculosis in this patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Griesel et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: