Key result
Rescue angioplasty achieves procedural success in acute MI with myocardial bridge after failed thrombolysis.
Why the study?
Myocardial bridge is an infrequent finding with unclear mechanisms causing myocardial ischemia, and the efficacy of medical management is unproven, complicating therapy decisions.
Case Report (n=1)
May warrant angioplasty consideration in select AMI with MB; leaves open need for prospective safety and efficacy data.
Rescue Coronary Angioplasty in a Patient with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Myocardial Bridge Case ReportMyocardial bridge ( MB) is an infrequent angiographic finding, with an incidence ranging from 0.5% to 2.5% 1 .At autopsy, however, it has ranged from 15% to 85% 2,3 .Most patients with MB are asymptomatic but, when symptoms are present, patients may have angina 4 , AMI 1,5,6 , and even sudden death 7 .The exact mechanism through which MB induces myocardial ischemia is currently unknown, making the identification and therapy of this condition more difficult.Medical management has included aspirin, calcium antagonists, and beta-blockers, although the efficacy of these drugs in preventing ischemic complications has not yet been proved 1,8 .Reports of coronary intervention with ballooncatheter and stent in patients with MB and angina or AMI have been described in the literature 1,9,10 .In this report, we a describe successful rescue coronary angioplasty in a patient who failed to respond to thrombolytic therapy.We have not found any similar reports in the literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Araújo et al. (1999) conducted a case report in Acute myocardial infarction and myocardial bridge (n=1). Rescue coronary angioplasty was evaluated on Procedural success. Rescue coronary angioplasty was successfully performed in a patient with acute myocardial infarction and myocardial bridge who failed to respond to thrombolytic therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: