Key result
Anesthesia-related critical incidents occur in ~10% of urological surgeries, with nearly all deemed preventable.
Why the study?
Anesthesia-related critical incidents during urological surgeries pose unique challenges and remain underreported, especially in low/middle-income countries, necessitating standardized analysis.
Observational (n=2,541)
No
Anesthesia-related critical incidents in urological surgeries are common (9.83%) and predominantly driven by preventable human factors, highlighting the need for improved training and vigilance.
Supports targeted human-factor interventions in urological anesthesia; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation before practice change.
Background Anesthesia-related critical incidents are significant causes of preventable harm during surgeries, particularly in specialized fields such as urology as they pose unique challenges, including advanced patient age, comorbidities, and complex procedures, which heighten anesthesia-related risks. These incidents are influenced by human errors, patient factors, and procedural complexity. Despite global advancements in safety protocols, there remains a need for standardized reporting and analysis of such incidents, especially in low/middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods A prospective and retrospective observational study was conducted from 2019 to 2022. Data was collected from the anesthesia database and perioperative records of 2,541 patients who underwent urological surgeries. Two hundred forty-one (9.48%) patients experienced critical incidents. Data included patient demographics such as age and gender, comorbidities, surgery details, and the timing and recognition of incidents. Incidents were divided into cardiovascular, respiratory, airway, central nervous system (CNS), and miscellaneous categories. A root cause analysis identified human and systemic factors. Results The incidence rate of critical incidents was 9.83%. The most common age group was 31-40 years (20.75%), and 71.36% of patients were men. Most incidents occurred in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grade I patients (58.09%) and during the induction phase of anesthesia (41.49%). Cardiovascular incidents were the most frequent (23.24%), followed by airway issues (12.86%). Human factors, such as the lack of skill (43.98%), vigilance (22.41%), and judgment (16.18%), were the leading causes. Surgical position, especially lithotomy, was significantly associated with incidents (p<0.0001), and a significant association between the time to recognition of an incident and the mode of recognition of the incident was also found (p<0.0001). Notably, 98.75% of incidents were deemed preventable with existing protocols. Conclusion Human factors, especially the lack of skill, vigilance, and judgment, emerged as the primary contributors to critical incidents in anesthetic procedures. Emphasizing improved training, vigilance during induction, and attention to patient positioning can enhance patient safety. Most incidents were preventable, highlighting the need for better reporting and preventive protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waghalkar et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Urological surgeries under anesthesia (n=2,541). Urological surgeries under anesthesia was evaluated on Incidence of critical incidents. The incidence rate of anesthesia-related critical incidents during urological surgeries was 9.83%, with human factors being the primary contributors and 98.75% of incidents deemed preventable.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: