Implementation of an ERAS program in patients undergoing thoracic surgery at a third-level university hospital. An ambispective cohort study

Objetive T o analyze the effects of the implementation of an ERAS program in patients undergoing pulmonary resection in a tertiary university hospital on the rates of complications and readmission and the length of stay. Methods ambispective cohort study, with a prospective arm of patients undergoing thoracic surgery within an ERAS program versus a retrospective arm of patients before the implementation of the protocol. We recluited 50 patients per arm. The primary outcome was the number of patients with 30-day surgical complications. Secondary outcome included ERAS adherence, no-surgical complications, mortality, readmission, reintervention rates, pain and hospital lenght of stay. We performed a multivariate logistic analysis to study the association of coutcomes with ERAS adherence. Results We found no difference between the two groups in surgical complications [Standard 18 (36%) vs 12 (24%], p =0.19]. ERAS group was significantly lower only in its readmission rate [Standard 15 (30%) vs 6 (12%], p =0.03]. In multivariate analyses, ERAS adherence was the only factor associated with a reduction in surgical complications [OR (95%CI) = 0.02 (0.00, 0.59), p = 0.03] and length of stay [HR (95%CI) = 18.5 (4.39, 78.4), p < 0.001]. Conclusions ERAS program was able to decrease the readmission rate at our centre significantly. The adherence to the ERAS protocol influenced the reduction of surgical complications and length of stay.