Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The problem is to decide on the basis of repeated independent observations whether θ₀ or θ₁ is the true value of the parameter θ of a Koopman-Darmois family of densities, where the error probabilities are at most α₀ and α₁. An explicit method is derived for determining a combination of one-sided SPRT's, known, as a 2-SPRT, which minimizes the maximum expected sample size to within o((log α⁻¹₀)1/2) as α₀ and α₁ go to 0, subject to the condition that 0 < C₁ < log α₀/logα₁ < C₂ < ∞ for fixed but arbitrary constants C₁ and C₂. For the case of testing the mean of an exponential density, extensive computer calculations comparing the proposed 2-SPRT with optimal procedures show that the 2-SPRT comes within 2% of minimizing the maximum expected sample size over a broad range of error probability and parameter values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael D. Huffman (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: