Key result
Integrated Chronic Disease Management is linked to ~6-fold higher odds of CD4 control vs standard care.
Why the study?
The study aimed to determine individual-level and facility-level predictors of controlled CD4 count and blood pressure in patients receiving treatment for HIV and hypertension under the Integrated Chronic Disease Management model in South Africa.
Observational (n=878)
Yes
Odds Ratio: 5.84 (95% CI 3.21–8.22)
ICDM was associated with better CD4 and BP control in this setting; leaves open generalizability and causality without randomized trials.
Objective In 2011, The National Department of Health introduced the Integrated Chronic Disease Management (ICDM) model as a pilot programme in selected primary healthcare facilities in South Africa. The objective of this study was to determine individual-level and facility-level predictors of controlled CD4 count and blood pressure (BP) in patients receiving treatment for HIV and hypertension, respectively. Design A panel study. Setting and participants This study was conducted in the Bushbuckridge Municipality, South Africa from 2011 to 2013. Facility records of patients aged ≥18 years were retrieved from the integrated chronic disease management (ICDM) pilot (n=435) and comparison facilities (n=443) using a three-step probability sampling process. CD4 count and BP control are defined as CD4 count >350 cells/mm 3 and BP <140/90 mm Hg. A multilevel Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator binary logistic regression analysis was done at a 5% significance level using STATA V.16. Primary outcome measures CD4 (cells/mm 3 ) count and BP (mm Hg). Results Compared with the comparison facilities, patients receiving treatment in the pilot facilities had increased odds of controlling their CD4 count (OR=5.84, 95% CI 3.21–8.22) and BP (OR=1.22, 95% CI 1.04–2.14). Patients aged 50–59 (OR=6.12, 95% CI 2.14–7.21) and ≥60 (OR=7.59, 95% CI 4.75–11.82) years had increased odds of controlling their CD4 counts compared with those aged 18–29 years. Likewise, patients aged 40–49 (OR=5.73, 95% CI 1.98–8.43), 50–59 (OR=7.28, 95% CI 4.33–9.27) and ≥60 (OR=9.31, 95% CI 5.12–13.68) years had increased odds of controlling their BP. In contrast, men had decreased odds of controlling their CD4 count (OR=0.12, 95% CI 0.10–0.46) and BP (OR=0.21, 95% CI 0.19–0.47) than women. Conclusion The ICDM model had a small but significant effect on BP control, hence, the need to more effectively leverage the HIV programme for optimal BP control in the setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ameh et al. (2020) conducted an observational in HIV and hypertension (n=878). Integrated Chronic Disease Management (ICDM) model vs. Comparison facilities (standard care) was evaluated on CD4 count control (>350 cells/mm3) (OR 5.84, 95% CI 3.21-8.22). The Integrated Chronic Disease Management model significantly increased the odds of controlling CD4 count (OR 5.84) and blood pressure (OR 1.22) compared to standard care facilities.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: