Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present the first sample-level search for supermassive black hole binaries (SMBHBs) requiring coherent quasi-periodicity at a common period in the X-ray and optical bands, over 1194 Swift–Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) hard X-ray active galactic nuclei (AGN) (Stage 1) and 175 4XMM-DR14 AGN (Stage 2). No source is a coperiodic candidate. Each light curve is modelled as a damped random walk (DRW) and searched with a Lomb–Scargle periodogram and a look-elsewhere-corrected Monte Carlo significance. Because DRW red noise is largely independent between corona and disk, we require both bands individually significant with periods coincident within 5%, and gate the survivors with the model-independent null-signal-template test of J. Robnik et al. Over P = 100–900 days the completeness-corrected 95% upper limit on the coperiodic fraction is amplitude-dependent: ≲3% for hard-X-ray fractional modulation ≳0.3, ≈15% (precision-limited) at 0.2, and uninformative below ∼0.15 (the ϵ = 1 floor is 0.25%). The sensitivity is set by the hard X-ray monitoring, not the optical photometry or the statistics, the opposite of the usual assumption. Daily MAXI and RXTE/ASM monitoring of the brightest AGN raises the X-ray completeness 5–8-fold, and the search remains null. Integrated over the BAT black hole mass function, the expected all-amplitude coperiodic fraction is ∼ 3 × 1 0 − 2 f bin δ mod (modulo a factor g < 1), with f bin the subparsec binary fraction, δ mod the modulating duty cycle, and g the fraction reaching recoverable hard-X-ray amplitude, so a null is expected. We deliver a validated cross-band framework and the first completeness-corrected constraint on the coperiodic fraction, ready for the denser X-ray monitoring of Einstein Probe and eROSITA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karan Akbari (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: