Key result
Stress PET/CT misregistration by 10 mm is linked to ~24% lower estimated global myocardial blood flow.
Why the study?
The effect of cardiac PET/CT misregistration on the quantification of myocardial blood flow has not been studied.
Observational (n=10)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Misregistration may artifactually bias clinical MBF estimates; leaves open need for standardized coregistration protocols in quantitative PET.
UNLABELLED: Misregistration of cardiac PET/CT data can lead to misinterpretation of regional myocardial perfusion. However, the effect of misregistration on the quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) has not been studied. METHODS: Cardiac (82)Rb-PET/CT scans of 10 patients with normal regional myocardial perfusion were analyzed. Realignment was done for the baseline and stress PET/CT images as necessary, and MBF was obtained from dynamic data. Then, the stress images were misregistered by 5 mm along the x-axis (left) and z-axis (cranial) and again by 10 mm. A 10-mm misregistration in the opposite direction (-10 mm along the x-axis [right] and z-axis [caudal]) was also tested. Stress MBF was recalculated for 5-, 10-, and -10-mm misregistrations. RESULTS: Stress MBF of the left ventricle decreased by 10% ± 6% (P = 0.005) after 5-mm misregistration and by 24% ± 15% (P = 0.001) after 10-mm misregistration. In descending order, the most important stress MBF changes occurred in the anterior (39% ± 9%), lateral (34% ± 9%), apical (20% ± 16%), inferior (12% ± 10%), and septal (10% ± 12%) walls after 10-mm misregistration. Lesser changes were observed after 5-mm misregistration, with the same wall distribution. In contrast, -10-mm misregistration increased global MBF by 9% ± 6% (P = 0.004). In descending order, the overestimation of estimated MBF after -10-mm misregistration occurred in the lateral (15% ± 8%), apical (15% ± 18%), anterior (9% ± 5%), and inferior (9% ± 11%) walls. CONCLUSION: Misregistration of the stress PET/CT dataset leads to significant global and regional artifactual alterations in the estimated MBF. Quantitative error was observed throughout the myocardium and was not confined to those heart regions that extended into the lung on misregistered CT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rajaram et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Normal regional myocardial perfusion (n=10). Cardiac PET/CT misregistration vs. Properly aligned PET/CT images was evaluated on Stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) of the left ventricle (24% ± 15% decrease (10-mm misregistration), p=0.001). Misregistration of stress PET/CT images by 10 mm caused a significant 24% ± 15% decrease in estimated global stress myocardial blood flow (P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: