Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved substantial progress in solving complex mathematical problems, yet they often fail to exploit the potential value embedded in their own mistakes. Existing methods either apply coarse-grained corrections or rely on costly self-reflection, overlooking valid reasoning steps and incurring high inference overhead. To address these limitations, we propose Enhancing Reasoning through Error-Aware Learning (EREAL), a framework that enables fine-grained learning from edit-localized corrections. Our approach introduces minimal-edit correction, which revises only erroneous segments while preserving correct reasoning, and a dynamic error-aware loss that adaptively weights tokens based on error proportion. Experiments on seven mathematical reasoning benchmarks with instruction-tuned LLaMA-3.1-8B, DeepSeek-Math-7B, and Mistral-7B-v0.3 show consistent accuracy improvements. In particular, using only 4159 minimal-edit correction examples, the Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 pipeline improves average accuracy by 23.9% relative to the original instruction-tuned baseline, while EREAL further delivers consistent gains over standard SFT trained on the same correction data. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of edit-localized supervision and the additional benefit of our error-aware learning objective. Our code is available at https://github.com/WHUIR/EREAL .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: