In India between 2010-11 and 2024-25, the price a private college charged rose at 10.2 per cent a year while the pay a new graduate earned rose at 2.6 per cent and fell by 30.3 per cent in real terms. In ordinary markets, when a good becomes more common its price falls. Here the opposite happened: the number of degree-holders grew by 38.5 per cent, the number of institutions by 31.9 per cent, the gross enrolment ratio from 21.1 to 30 per cent - and fees doubled in real terms. This paper names that contradiction the Double Inflation Principle: a market failure in which credential devaluation accelerates tuition inflation through an escalating positional arms race. On a new 15-year panel of 50 named private colleges - every 2024-25 fee published, six fee histories published, the remaining paths reconstructed and used only as a validated simulation device - every hypothesis is tested on published data alone. Reputation band and stream explain 84.5 per cent of the variation in observed fee levels; across eight published fee histories the wedge over the cost floor rises with positioning intensity (exact permutation p = 0.053); the premium segment compounded 115 per cent of excess price over the cost of running itself, and that credential value per rupee fell to 63-78 at the top of the market. A value equation closes the loop: every rupee of excess price is, by arithmetic, a rupee of value destroyed, which pushes the next cohort upmarket - CAT registrations rose 61.3 per cent - where the sellers of the better signal raise their price. I prove the loop's fixed point, estimate its gain, and report every null result honestly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
TISHAY DANGARE (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: