Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A novel series of purine–biphenyl hybrids was designed and synthesized by linking 2,6-dichloropurine with methyl-2-cyanobiphenyl, aiming to develop cytotoxic agents targeting the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR). Structural diversity was introduced via C6 substitution with different aniline derivatives, affording compounds 4a-4j. In vitro screening against the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line revealed compound 4h (2-CF3) as the most active (IC50 = 19.06 µM), followed by 4d (4-CF3, 2-Br) and 4c (4-F). Structure-activity relationship analysis indicated that electron-withdrawing substituents enhanced cytotoxicity, while unsubstituted and electron-donating derivatives were less active. Molecular docking identified compounds 4h and 4d as the top binders, with binding affinities of −19.6 and −19.2 kcal/mol, respectively, surpassing the reference drug doxorubicin. Molecular dynamics simulations over 100 ns demonstrated stable binding conformations for both compounds, supported by MM/GBSA calculations. Compound 4d maintained favorable binding free energies (−36.7 to −27.5 kcal/mol), while 4h exhibited ΔG binding energies ranging from −30.4 to −49.8 kcal/mol, indicating enhanced interaction strength over time. ADMET predictions further revealed good oral absorption, low toxicity, and favorable drug-likeness for both compounds. These integrated results suggest that compounds 4d and 4h have considerable potency against EGFR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mehariya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: