Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Based on the first principles of ontology, this paper carries the extended theory through to a rigorous, fully connected formulation and adds a global--local observer framework. The extended theory comprises three main lines: T4 treats Lorentz violation, where the residual violation is soft, of magnitude η~ lP/L, and is suppressed at low energies by the Planck scale, connecting to doubly special relativity; T5 completes the unified field description, comprising explicit expressions for the six couplings among the four fields (gμν,D,φ,ψ), the Feynman rules and tree-level amplitudes for the D--matter coupling, and an upper bound on the φ--matter coupling of β<10⁻⁶², so that the uncoupled case is taken as the simplest hypothesis; and T6 rigorously proves that the low-energy limit recovers general relativity+ΛCDM+the Standard Model, that all four classes of higher-order corrections are negligible, and that the numerical computations (RGE, Geff, $dx(v)$, black hole entropy) agree with the analytical solutions, and it provides four classes of testable experimental predictions together with an explicit falsification path. The newly added global--local observer framework draws a clear definitional distinction between the local observer (scheme B, w≥-1, with no phantom phase) and the global observer (route A, where w may be $<-1$ and the phantom arises from the production--dilution mechanism), establishes the averaging transformation that carries the local field theory over to the global effective theory, proves that ``the average of a ratio is not equal to the ratio of averages,'' and clarifies that the ``sign flip of the kinetic term'' is an artifact of applying the global effective density within local scalar-field formulas rather than genuine physics, thereby supplying a production--dilution interpretation of the phantom phase of dark energy. All conclusions of this paper are restricted to the scope of what has been proved; the explicit mathematical form of the global averaging transformation and the calculation of the local w_φ(z) are open problems left to future work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shuai Wang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: