Accurate asphalt-pavement rutting prediction is central to performance-oriented design, but mechanistic-empirical models may not capture section-specific responses, while data-driven models offer limited physical interpretability. This study proposes a physics-guided feature-enhanced framework that incorporates the output of a low-fidelity mechanistic-empirical model as an engineered feature alongside layer-specific pavement variables. Long-term observations from 19 RIOHTrack sections spanning seven structural types were evaluated using pavement-section-based five-fold grouped cross-validation. PHY-XGBoost achieved the best performance (R² = 0.9391, RMSE = 4.6189 mm, MAE = 3.5680 mm, and MAPE = 6.9411%), reducing RMSE by 53.26% compared with the baseline XGBoost model. SHAP analysis identified the mechanistic-empirical feature, cumulative traffic loading, temperature, and third-layer dynamic modulus as the four most influential features; together, they accounted for 93.0% of total mean absolute SHAP importance. In an illustrative case, screening a bounded library of RIOHTrack-observed parameter templates reduced predicted rutting depth from 89.20 mm to 71.08 mm under a modulus-adjustment scheme and to 56.87 mm under a separate thickness-position scheme. The framework integrates section-level prediction, interpretable feature analysis, and transparent screening of reference pavement configurations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: