Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In Brief Objective: To determine if suture type used for mesh attachment in abdominal sacrocolpopexy increases the rate of erosion/infection. Methods: Two groups were temporally divided from June 1996 to May 2001 where braided permanent sutures (2-0 Ethibond, Ethicon, Somerville, New Jersey) were exclusively used for graft placement (n = 161) and from August 2001 to May 2006 where exclusively monofilament delayed absorbable (2-0 PDS, Ethicon) was used (n = 254). Data were analyzed for demographics, medical history, presenting/postoperative physical examination, concomitant surgeries, and complications. Results: Mesh/suture exposure rate was 3.7% (6/161) with Ethibond. There were no erosions with PDS (P = 0.002). Colpopexy failure was 1.7% (2/116) with Ethibond and 0% (0/235) with PDS (P = 0.11). Conclusions: Delayed absorbable, monofilament suture appears to reduce the risk of graft/suture erosion without increasing surgical failure. Monofilament delayed-absorbable suture seems to reduce suture and/or mesh erosion when compared with braided permanent suture. We were unable to demonstrate an increased rate of colpopexy failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shepherd et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: