Key result
SCAD patients show spontaneous recovery with mean LVEF improving to ~61% at follow-up.
Why the study?
Left ventricular ejection fraction on presentation and follow-up imaging after spontaneous coronary artery dissection has not been described.
Cohort (n=277)
No
BACKGROUND: Spontaneous healing of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery is frequently observed clinically. However, LVEF on presentation and follow-up imaging has not been described. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that LV dysfunction improves at follow-up after initial SCAD presentation. METHODS: We included patients with nonatherosclerotic SCAD prospectively followed at Vancouver General Hospital, who had baseline assessment of LVEF and wall-motion abnormality (WMA) during their index presentation. A subset of these patients had repeat assessment of their ventricular function at follow-up. We compared the baseline LVEF and WMA with follow-up assessments and correlated to long-term cardiovascular outcomes. RESULTS: We included 277 SCAD patients who had baseline ventricular assessment performed. The average age was 52.4 ± 9.4 years, and 90.3% were female. All presented with myocardial infarction (24.2% STEMI, 75.8% NSTEMI). At baseline, the mean LVEF was 55.6% ± 9.1% and 72/277 (26.0%) had LVEF <50%. The presence of WMA was observed in 237/277 (85.6%) cases. Of 164 patients with repeat assessments, the baseline LVEF was 54.6% ± 9.2%, with improvement to 60.7% ± 7.2% at follow-up (P < 0.001). Baseline LVEF of <50% was observed in 29.9%, but only 6.7% had LVEF <50% at follow-up (P < 0.001). Baseline WMA was observed in 87.2% but decreased to 44.5% at follow-up (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that presentation with STEMI (odds ratio [OR]: 2.71, P = 0.001), troponin I >50 µg/L (OR: 1.02, P = 0.005), and SCAD involvement of the LAD (OR: 2.5, P = 0.002) were independent predictors of baseline LVEF <50%. CONCLUSIONS: In our large, prospectively followed SCAD cohort, the majority of patients presented with WMA and had relatively normal LVEF. Over half had subsequent normalization of WMA and LVEF on follow-up assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Franco et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) (n=277). Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) vs. Baseline assessment was evaluated on Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at follow-up (p=<0.001). In patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection, mean LVEF improved from 54.6% to 60.7% at follow-up, and wall-motion abnormalities decreased from 87.2% to 44.5% (P<0.001 for both).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: