Key result
A1C of 6.5% or higher shows only ~40% sensitivity for diagnosing diabetes by OGTT.
Why the study?
The sensitivity and specificity of an A1C threshold of 6.5% or higher to diagnose diabetes among Filipino Americans, Japanese Americans, and Native Hawaiians needed to be examined.
What are the sensitivity and specificity of A1C >= 6.5% compared with OGTT and FPG to diagnose type 2 diabetes in Filipino Americans, Japanese Americans, and Native Hawaiians?
Cross-Sectional (n=933)
Yes
What are the sensitivity and specificity of A1C >= 6.5% compared with OGTT and FPG to diagnose type 2 diabetes in Filipino Americans, Japanese Americans, and Native Hawaiians?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Using an A1C >= 6.5% threshold alone misses 60% of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes cases in Filipino, Japanese, and Native Hawaiian adults due to a high prevalence of isolated postchallenge hyperglycemia.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the sensitivity and specificity of A1C ≥ 6.5% to diagnose diabetes among Filipino Americans, Japanese Americans, and Native Hawaiians. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study among middle-aged adults without prior diagnosis of type 2 diabetes who completed a 2-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and A1C measures. RESULTS: The 933 participants had a mean age of 54.2 years, and 73% were women. A total of 425 (45.5%) subjects had impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance, 145 (15.5%) had type 2 diabetes (by OGTT), and 83 (8.9%) had A1C ≥ 6.5%. The sensitivity and specificity of A1C ≥ 6.5% to define diabetes (by OGTT) was 40.0 and 96.8% and 68.9 and 95.3%, respectively (by fasting plasma glucose only). However, (64.8%) of Filipino and Japanese subjects with diabetes had isolated postchallenge hyperglycemia; AIC ≥ 6.5% sensitivity and specificity was 19.1 and 92.1%, respectively, to define isolated postchallenge hyperglycemia in the total sample. CONCLUSIONS: A1C ≥ 6.5% had low sensitivity and may delay diagnosis of type 2 diabetes without OGTT. This limitation is exacerbated by isolated postchallenge hyperglycemia in Asian Americans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Araneta et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes (n=933). A1C >= 6.5% diagnostic threshold vs. 2-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was evaluated on Sensitivity and specificity of A1C >= 6.5% to diagnose type 2 diabetes (defined by OGTT). A1C >= 6.5% had 40.0% sensitivity and 96.8% specificity for diagnosing type 2 diabetes by OGTT among Filipino Americans, Japanese Americans, and Native Hawaiians.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: