Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Apocalyptic accounts of globalization bringing about the end of the welfare state (and the nation state) have been countered by political-institutionalist views of adaptation. Such views treat globalization as an external force, or pressure, rather than a set of processes that are also internalized within nations. I argue that a more differentiated view of globalization can reveal how it has unsettled welfare state/nation-state formations. In the process, taken-for-granted meanings and boundaries of nation-state-welfare have been destabilized. I conclude by suggesting that these processes have made citizenship a distinctive focus of political tensions and conflicts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John Henrik Clarke (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: