Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper offers a lighter version of the harder HB protocol (hHB) denoted Light-hHB. This proposal uses the same framework as hHB, that is a two stages protocol: the first one for the establishment of a session key between the reader and the tag and the second one similar to HB+ which was proposed in Crypto ’05 by Hopper and Blum. We also introduce in this paper a novel and lightweight key exchange protocol inspired by the BB84 protocol named the non-quantum key exchange protocol. With the use of a practical implementation of the latter protocol in the first stage of Light-hHB, the transmission cost is drastically reduced compared to the one of hHB, which is its main drawback. In the context of resource-constrained IoT devices, Light- hHB is significantly more practical than hHB and achieves the same security goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmad Khoureich Ka (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: