This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective To validate autoSCORE, a convolutional neural network (SCORE-AI) implemented into a commercially available EEG reader, for analysis of long-term EEG (LT-EEG) recordings, and to evaluate it within the human-in-the-loop approach. Methods autoSCORE automatically divides LT-EEG into 2-hour segments, labeling each as normal or as containing one or more of four abnormality categories: focal epileptiform, generalized epileptiform, focal non-epileptiform, or diffuse non-epileptiform. In abnormal segments, it also inserts markers defined by start/stop times and tagged by abnormality type. Within each category, markers can be ranked by decreasing probability. Eighty 2-hour LT-EEG segments (40 in-hospital, 40 ambulatory) from patients aged 0.9–82.3 years were analyzed by autoSCORE. The diagnostic reference standard was derived from independent conventional visual assessment by three human experts. Results Accuracy computed across expert-expert and AI-expert pairings, evaluated at the level of the 2-hour segments, were comparable, except for detection of focal non-epilepiform abnormality, where AI outperformed experts for identification accuracy (p = 0.019). The positive predictive value of the automated abnormality markers was 0.446–0.823. In the human-in-the-loop workflow, inspecting 10 automated markers with the highest probability in each category enabled correct identification of all abnormal segments, corresponding to 1.5%–5.5% of the full 2-hour segment. Conclusions autoSCORE accurately screens LT-EEG recordings and may serve as an adjunct to human EEG interpretation to reduce the workload of human experts. Significance autoSCORE is a validated tool that can increase the productivity and efficacy of human experts in assessment of LT-EEG to improve patient diagnosis and management strategies.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“If you are practicing in an area where there is no EEG expertise, and there are many such areas around the world, then this model could be much better than not having an expert at all.”
“Overinterpretation of clinical EEG is the most common cause of misdiagnosing epilepsy. AI tools may be a solution for this challenge, both as an additional resource for confirmation and classification of epilepsy, and as an aid for the interpretation of EEG in critical care medicine.”
“It's a really exciting paper. When it's available, I'm sure we will all use it. But can somebody who is not trained to read EEGs use this as a replacement to do it themselves instead of having to send it out? I don't know, based on one study, that I would feel comfortable with that.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tveit et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: