Why the study?
Accurate assessment of aortic stenosis requires integration of both structural and functional information, but existing AI models use only structural or functional data alone.
Does an automated multiview deep learning framework combining B-mode/Doppler echocardiography videos and automated peak aortic velocity measurements accurately classify aortic stenosis severity compared to physician interpretation and single-view models?
Cohort (n=45,852)
Yes
Does an automated multiview deep learning framework combining B-mode/Doppler echocardiography videos and automated peak aortic velocity measurements accurately classify aortic stenosis severity compared to physician interpretation and single-view models?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“Given that existing approaches do not fully leverage the complementary information available from multiple videos and Doppler measurements, we hypothesized that an integrated framework combining all relevant echocardiographic information could improve the accuracy and clinical reliability of AS assessment.”
EchoNet-AS demonstrates that integrating multiview echocardiographic B-mode and color Doppler videos with automated Doppler peak velocity measurements provides highly accurate and generalizable classification of aortic stenosis severity across multiple institutions.
BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of aortic stenosis (AS) requires integration of both structural and functional information characterized by visual traits as well as quantitation of gradients. Existing artificial intelligence models use solely either structural or functional information. OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to develop and validate an automated multiview deep learning framework to assess AS severity. METHODS: The authors developed EchoNet-AS, an open-source end-to-end integrated approach combining video-based convolutional neural networks to assess valve motion with segmentation models to automate measurement of aortic valve peak velocity and classify AS severity. RESULTS: EchoNet-AS was trained on 210,193 images from 16,076 studies from KPNC (Kaiser Permanente Northern California) and validated on 1,588 held-out test studies and a temporally distinct cohort of 19,202 studies. The final model was also externally validated on 2,415 studies from SHC (Stanford Healthcare) and 9,038 studies from CSMC (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center). Combining assessments from multiple echocardiographic videos and Doppler measurements, EchoNet-AS achieved excellent discrimination of severe AS with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.964 (95% CI: 0.952-0.973) in the KPNC held-out cohort and 0.986 (0.983-0.989) in the temporally distinct cohort, which was superior to models using single views or only Doppler measurements. The performance was consistently robust in distinct external cohorts with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.985 (0.975-0.992) at SHC and 0.989 (0.986-0.992) at CSMC. CONCLUSIONS: EchoNet-AS synthesizes information from both B-mode videos and Doppler images to accurately assess AS severity. Its strong performance generalizes robustly to external validation cohorts and shows potential as an automated clinical decision support tool.
Journal, society, and media accounts. Useful signal, not independent expert judgment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ieki et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Aortic stenosis (n=45,852). EchoNet-AS automated multiview deep learning framework (combining B-mode/color Doppler video CNNs and automated Doppler peak velocity measurement) vs. Single-view deep learning models and finalized physician echocardiography reports (reference standard) was evaluated on Discrimination of severe aortic stenosis (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUC]) (AUC 0.964 in KPNC held-out cohort (0.985-0.986 in temporal cohort, 0.985 at SHC, 0.989 at CSMC), 95% CI 0.952-0.973).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: