Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of two intermittent regimens for the simultaneous primary prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) and toxoplasmosis in HIV-infected patients. DESIGN: Prospective randomized open trial. SETTING: HIV outpatient clinic of an Infectious Disease Service and a 1000-bed university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 166 HIV-infected patients with a CD4 cell count < 200 x 10(6)/l or a CD4 percentage < 20%, without previous PCP or toxoplasmosis. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to oral (1) cotrimoxazole [160 mg trimethoprim (TMP) and 800 mg sulphamethoxazole (SMX)] twice a day on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays (n = 81), or (2) dapsone (100 mg) plus pyrimethamine (25 mg) (DP) once a week (n = 85). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical and biological evaluation was performed every 30-60 days. End-points were PCP, toxoplasmosis and death. Adverse reactions were considered as defined in the protocol. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 380 days, intention-to-treat analysis revealed that DP patients had a higher rate of PCP [13 out of 85 (15.2%) versus three out of 81 (3.7%); P = 0.01]. The cumulative rates of PCP at 12 and 24 months were 5 and 42% for DP patients and 3 and 10% for TMP-SMX patients, respectively (Mantel-Cox, P = 0.0007). Of the 29 patients who died during follow-up, 14 were in the TMP-SMX group and 15 in the DP group (not significant). Two patients in the TMP-SMX group and three in the DP group developed toxoplasmosis (not significant). Adverse reactions were common (66.7% of TMP-SMX patients and 42.4% of DP patients; P = 0.001). However, only 12.3% of TMP-SMX patients and 2.3% of DP patients (P = 0.01) had to discontinue therapy because of toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: At the given doses, DP was inferior to TMP-SMX in preventing first episodes of PCP. Although more patients and a longer follow-up are required, the regimens appeared to prevent toxoplasmosis equally well.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Podzamczer et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: