Key result
Optimized wavelet algorithms achieve ~99% detection accuracy in embedded systems with halved memory usage.
Why the study?
Existing biomedical wavelet based applications exceed the computational, memory, and power resources of low-complexity embedded systems, necessitating optimization and implementation techniques.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Existing biomedical wavelet based applications exceed the computational, memory and consumption resources of low-complexity embedded systems. In order to make such systems capable to use wavelet transforms, optimization and implementation techniques are proposed. The Real Time QRS Detector and ?De-noising? Filter are developed and implemented in 16-bit fixed point microcontroller achieving 800 Hz sampling rate, occupation of less than 500 bytes of data memory, 99.06% detection accuracy, and 1 mW power consumption. By evaluation of the obtained results it is found that the proposed techniques render negligible degradation in detection accuracy of -0.41% and SNR of -2.8%, behind 2-4 times faster calculation, 2 times less memory usage and 5% energy saving. The same approach can be applied with other signals where the embedded implementation of wavelets can be beneficial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stojanovic et al. (2013) studied this question. Optimized wavelet based algorithms vs. Existing biomedical wavelet based applications was evaluated on Detection accuracy and resource utilization. Optimized wavelet-based algorithms for embedded systems achieved 99.06% detection accuracy and 1 mW power consumption, with 2-4 times faster calculation and halved memory usage.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: