Key result
Prompted SMBP engagement declines as health-related social needs increase despite favorable patient perception.
Why the study?
Mobile health interventions offer scalable opportunities to engage hypertensive patients in self-measured blood pressure monitoring, but determinants of engagement in such interventions are not well understood.
No mHealth component improved BP reduction over others; leaves open whether SMS-prompted SMBP monitoring enhances control versus usual care in safety-net populations.
BACKGROUND Mobile health (mHealth) interventions serve as a scalable opportunity to engage people with hypertension in self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) monitoring, an evidence-based approach to lowering blood pressure (BP) and improving BP control. Reach Out is an SMS text messaging–based SMBP mHealth trial that aims to reduce BP among hypertensive patients recruited from the emergency department of a safety net hospital in a low-income, predominately Black city. OBJECTIVE As the benefits of Reach Out are predicated on participants’ engagement with the intervention, we sought to understand participants’ determinants of engagement via prompted SMBP with personalized feedback (SMBP+feedback). METHODS We conducted semistructured telephone interviews based on the digital behavior change interventions framework. Participants were purposively sampled from 3 engagement categories: high engagers (≥80% response to SMBP prompts), low engagers (≤20% response to BP prompts), and early enders (participants who withdrew from the trial). RESULTS We conducted interviews with 13 participants, of whom 7 (54%) were Black, with a mean age of 53.6 (SD 13.25) years. Early enders were less likely to be diagnosed with hypertension prior to Reach Out, less likely to have a primary care provider, and less likely to be taking antihypertensive medications than their counterparts. Overall, participants liked the SMS text messaging design of the intervention, including the SMBP+feedback. Several participants across all levels of engagement expressed interest in and identified the benefit of enrolling in the intervention with a partner of their choice. High engagers expressed the greatest understanding of the intervention, the least number of health-related social needs, and the greatest social support to engage in SMBP. Low engagers and early enders shared a mixed understanding of the intervention and less social support compared to high engagers. Participation decreased as social needs increased, with early enders sharing the greatest amount of resource insecurity apart from a notable exception of a high engager with high health-related social needs. CONCLUSIONS Prompted SMBP+feedback was perceived favorably by all participants. To enhance SMBP engagement, future studies could consider greater support in the initiation of SMBP, evaluating and addressing participants’ unmet health-related social needs, as well as strategies to cultivate social norms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hellem et al. (2022) studied Hypertension (n=13). Prompted self-measured blood pressure monitoring with personalized feedback vs. Different levels of engagement (high, low, early enders) was evaluated on Determinants of engagement in self-measured blood pressure monitoring. Among 13 interviewed participants, prompted self-measured blood pressure monitoring was perceived favorably, but engagement decreased as health-related social needs increased.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: