Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: Insular glioma often invades into the frontal and/or temporal lobes, leading to huge expansion of tumor volume. Surgical removal of huge fronto-temporo-insular glioma (FTIG) remains challenging, and we have removed huge FTIGs using two-staged resections. This report aimed to review our experiences and discuss the adaptation, interval, risks, and outcomes of two-staged resections for huge FTIG. Methods: Eight patients with huge FTIG comprising 7 isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH) -mutant gliomas and one IDH-wild glioblastoma, underwent two-staged resections. Tumors in the cerebral lobes were resected in the first operation. After a mean interval of 44.5 days, insular glioma and remaining tumor in the cerebral lobes were resected under awake and sedated conditions in the second operation. Results: Mean tumor volume was 126.7 ± 24.5 cm 3 and mean extent of resection (EOR) after the second operation was 84.8 ± 10.8%. However, EOR was 78.7% in patients with FTIG invading into the basal ganglia or sitting in the left cerebrum. No patients showed adverse events of grade 3 or 4. During the interval between operations, hyperintensity volume on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging remained stable or was slightly reduced in all patients. Median progression-free survival was 1082 days. Conclusion: These findings suggested that two-staged resections represented feasible surgical option, in particularly for IDH-mutant FTIG. However, further studies including more subjects and comparisons to single-staged resection are needed to verify the benefits of two-staged resections for huge FTIG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beppu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: