Key result
Unexpected emergency department cardiac arrest shows no difference in ROSC compared to expected arrest.
Why the study?
Data on in-hospital cardiac arrest in the emergency department, especially unexpected cardiac arrest, are scarce compared to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Observational (n=109)
No
Absolute Event Rate: 44.7% vs 33.8%
p-value: p=ns
Unexpected arrests comprise over one-third of ED cardiac arrests with similar ROSC rates; hypothesis-generating for monitoring strategies in non-critical areas.
Background. Though out-of-hospital CA (OHCA) is widely reported, data on in-hospital CA (IHCA), and especially cardiac arrest (CA) in the emergency department (CAED), are scarce. This study aimed to determine the frequency, prevalence, and clinical features of unexpected CA in the ED and compare the data with those of expected CA in the ED. Methods. We defined unexpected CA in the ED as CA occurring in patients in non-critical ED-care areas, classified as not requiring strict monitoring. A retrospective analysis of cases from 2016–2018 was performed, in comparison to other patients experiencing CA in the ED. Results. The 38 cases of unexpected CA in this study constituted 34.5% of CA diagnosed in the ED and 8.4% of all CA treated in the ED. This population did not differ significantly from other CA in the ED regarding demographics, comorbidities, and survival rates. The commonest symptoms were dyspnoea, disorders of consciousness, generalised weakness, and chest pain. The commonest causes of death were acute myocardial infarction, malignant neoplasms with metastases, septic shock, pulmonary embolism, and heart failure. Conclusions. Unexpected CA in the ED represents a group of potentially avoidable CA and deaths. These patients should be analysed, and ED management should include measures aimed at reducing their incidence. Trial registration. The study protocol was approved by the local ethical committee of the author’s institute (Approval number NKBBN/140/2021). As the study was based upon a retrospective analysis of anonymised medical charts, no written consent was obtained from the patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szaruta-Raflesz et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Cardiac arrest in the emergency department (n=109). Unexpected cardiac arrest vs. Expected cardiac arrest was evaluated on Successful return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (p=ns). Unexpected cardiac arrests accounted for 34.5% of emergency department cardiac arrests and showed no significant difference in successful return of spontaneous circulation compared to expected cardiac arrests (44.7% vs 33.8%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: